ASO releases new guidance on Australia's sanctions laws

10 minute read  18.02.2025 Alberto Colla, Thomas Galloway, Annabel Green

We explore what the latest updates from the Australian Sanctions Office (ASO) mean for individuals and businesses navigating Australia's sanctions legislation.

New guidance notes

On 28 January 2025, the Australian Sanctions Office (ASO) released new guidance materials to help individuals and businesses comply with Australia's sanctions laws.

The new guidance provides welcome insights into what is otherwise a technical and complex legislative regime, and one that applies to an ever fluid range of countries, persons and entities.

Australia’s sanctions frameworks

What is the legal basis of Australia's sanctions?

Australia implements the following types of sanctions frameworks:

  • United Nations Security Council sanctions (UN Sanctions Regime), given effect primarily through the:
  • Charter of the United Nations Act 1945 (Cth); and
  • the Charter of the United Nations (Dealing with Assets) Regulations 2008 (Cth); and
  • autonomous sanctions (Autonomous Sanctions Regime), given effect primarily through the
  • Autonomous Sanctions Act 2011 (Cth); and
  • Autonomous Sanctions Regulations 2011 (Cth).

Australia implements the UN Sanctions Regime as a member of the United Nations. The Autonomous Sanctions Regime, by contrast, is used by the Australian Government to impose sanctions as an instrument of its own (i.e. autonomous) foreign policy.

Who monitors compliance with Australia's sanctions?

The ASO is the Australian sanctions regulator. ASO sits within the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) and works with other federal government agencies, such as the Department of Defence, Department of Home Affairs, Australian Border Force, Australian Federal Police and AUSTRAC, to promote compliance with Australian sanctions laws and respond to possible breaches.

What types of sanctions are imposed?

Australia’s sanctions frameworks generally impose the following types of sanctions:

Targeted financial sanctions Navigation Show below Hide below

Targeted financial sanctions (TFS) generally prohibit dealing with assets of designated persons and/or entities. For example, TFS prohibit persons from directly or indirectly making assets available to, or for the benefit of, designated persons or entities. TFS may also prohibit using or dealing with certain assets owned or controlled by designated persons or entities. DFAT maintains a ‘Consolidated List’ of all designated persons and entities. Designated persons and entities may also be subject to travel bans.

Sanctions on countries / regions / terrorist groups Navigation Show below Hide below

These types of sanctions generally restrict trade in certain goods, services and/or commercial activities with or in relation to specified countries, regions and terrorist groups. For example, such measures prohibit the import and/or export of certain goods, the provision of certain services, and engaging in certain commercial activities in connection with sanctioned countries, regions or terrorist groups (or certain persons or entities in those places in some cases).

Who must comply?

Australia’s sanctions laws apply to Australian citizens anywhere in the world; to any other person as long as they are within Australia; to conduct on Australian ships and aircraft; or where the results of the conduct occur in Australia (even if the conduct itself occurs outside of Australia).

Some exemptions apply. Notably, impacted individuals and businesses can seek sanctions permits. A sanctions permit is an authorisation granted by the Minister for Foreign Affairs (or their delegate) to undertake an activity that would otherwise be prohibited by Australia's sanctions laws. Various criteria must be met to obtain a sanctions permit, and such permits, if granted, are typically highly specific and subject to conditions.

In its latest guidance, ASO also states that sanctions permits are 'generally appropriate only where there is a clear likelihood of a sanctions contravention occurring'. In other words, ASO considers that 'broad and non-specific sanctions risks' are better managed through adopting reasonable precautions and due diligence measures (and not by attempting to use sanctions permits as a blanket means of mitigating sanctions risks). Sanctions permits also cannot be granted retrospectively. The Minister has granted several general permits that authorise some activities that would otherwise be prohibited (for example, permitting lawyers to deal with controlled assets of designated persons in connection with providing legal services).

What are the penalties for non-compliance?

A contravention of sanctions laws is a strict liability offence. This means that intention is not relevant to determining if a contravention took place, although a due diligence defence is available. Penalties include:

  • for an individual - up to 10 years in prison and/or a fine of 2,500 penalty units ($825,000 as of the time of writing) or three times the value of the transaction(s) (whichever is the greater)).
  • for a body corporate – a fine of up to 10,000 penalty units ($3.3 million as of the time of writing or three times the value of the transaction(s) (whichever is the greater)).

New guidance notes

As flagged above, ASO recently released the following new guidance notes:

  • Sanctions compliance for Australian Government agencies and employees. This guidance note provides information about key sanctions risks faced by (and possible mitigating measures that can be adopted by) Australian Government agencies. For example, when providing humanitarian aid, undertaking research and engaging in multilateral capacity-building.
  • Dealing with assets owned or controlled by designated persons and entities. This guidance note provides information on how to deal with assets that are owned or controlled by designated persons or entities. It touches on reporting requirements and how to determine the upstream ownership and control of an impacted asset. Relevantly, the guidance note stipulates that ownership does not only relate to legal title. Rather, it may also be indicated by a designated person or entity's right to 'exclusively enjoy, destroy, alter, alienate or dispose of, or maintain and recover possession of the asset'. Control, by contrast, can be indicated by a designated person or entity's command or direction over the impacted asset – e.g., through possession of the asset or the ability to dictate how it may be dealt with in comparison to other persons or entities. The guidance does not reveal whether a particular percentage ownership is indicative of ownership or control.
  • Financial transactions involving designated persons and entities. This guidance note provides information on concepts relevant to sanctions compliance in financial transactions.
  • Import, purchase or transport of firearms and other ‘arms or related matériel’ from sanctioned countries. This guidance note provides information to individuals and entities considering the import, purchase or transport of weapons (including firearms), ammunition, spare parts, accessories or other goods with possible military applications into Australia. It sets out a 'three-step' test for assessing whether a good falls under the definition for 'arms or related matériel'.
  • Reporting a sanctions contravention. This guidance note provides information as to how members of the public can report sanctions non-compliance to ASO. It flags that the ASO adopts a ‘graduated-risk based approach’ to sanctions compliance, meaning that the severity of ASO’s enforcement actions will be proportional to the risk and nature of the non-compliance.
  • Sanctions compliance for universities. This guidance notes provides information about key sanctions risks faced (and possible mitigating measures that can be adopted) by Australian universities, for example, that arise when enrolling students, employing staff, and/or engaging in research collaborations with persons and entities from sanctioned countries.

As mentioned, several existing guidance notes were also updated. These include: Digital Currency Exchanges, Cyber sanctions and related FAQs, Common High Priority Items for Russia, Australian export sector, Russian sanctions evasion methods and DPRK information technology (IT) workers.

Sanctions Compliance Toolkit

In addition to the new guidance notes, ASO has released a Sanctions Compliance Toolkit (SCT), which outlines key principles, risk management strategies, and best practices that individuals and businesses can adopt to help ensure that they do not contravene Australia’s sanctions regime. We have provided further information below.

Approach to identifying sanctions risks

The SCT provides an overview of Australia's sanctions laws, provides case studies about whether certain activities would breach Australia's sanctions regimes, and also sets out a structured approach to identifying and managing sanctions risks. We set out further detail on these points below.

Firstly, ASO has suggested businesses use a structured approach to identify sanctions risk outlined below.

  • Designated persons or entities: As set out above, the first step is to ascertain whether the activity is associated with designated persons or entities listed on the Consolidated List. This includes checking for any direct or indirect connection, such as making assets available to or dealing with assets controlled by those designated persons or entities.
  • Sanctioned countries, regions, or terrorist groups: If no connection to a designated person or entity is found, ASO suggests assessing whether the activity involves a sanctioned country/ region/ terrorist group. ASO considers that this assessment should evaluate whether the activity involves the export or import of sanctioned goods, the provision of sanctioned services, a sanctioned commercial activity, dealing with cultural property, restricted vessels or assets of former regimes and/or any other country-specific prohibitions or measures.

ASO encourages impacted parties to refer to its Sanctions Risk Assessment (SRA) (detailed below) in making the assessment. Impacted individuals and businesses can also contact ASO for assistance, if required.

Managing sanctions risks

In addition to providing a structured approach to identifying sanctions risks, the SCT emphasises the importance of businesses taking reasonable precautions and exercising due diligence to avoid sanctions contraventions. In that respect, the SCT provides recommendations for managing sanctions risks at an organisational and activity-based level. We have provided a summary of these recommendations below. Importantly, ASO has emphasised that what will be considered 'reasonable' is 'highly context-dependent and can vary based on factors such as the size and nature of the business, the complexity of its transactions, and the specific geographic regions and sanctions regulations involved'.

Organisational compliance Navigation Show below Hide below

As per ASO's guidance, organisational compliance involves the 'establishment and maintenance of internal policies, procedures, and controls within a regulated entity to ensure adherence to relevant sanctions laws. This includes regular staff training, risk assessments, and audits to verify compliance'.
ASO considers sanctions compliance programs (SCPs) are a pillar of organisational compliance. While the substance of SCPs will vary between organisations, ASO has recommended that they include:

  • a senior management commitment to sanctions compliance;
  • risk assessments;
  • a screening program;
  • ongoing staff training;
  • monitoring and enforcement; and
  • auditing.

In addition, SCPs may also include the establishment of a sanctions compliance committee and/or a general commitment to fostering a culture of compliance.

Activity-based compliance Navigation Show below Hide below

Activity-based compliance focuses on the specific actions and transactions. This includes monitoring and screening individual transactions, customers, and business partners to ensure they do not involve sanctioned entities or contravene sanctions. The SCT provides some case studies of activity-based compliance.

ASO also recommends impacted parties seek independent legal advice. ASO has emphasised that this is not only to understand how Australia's sanctions laws apply to a specific organisation, but as part of documenting the steps an impacted party has taken to identify sanctions risks.

Sanctions Risk Assessment Tool

The SRA is a structured questionnaire which can be used by individuals and businesses to make a preliminary assessment of the sanctions risks associated with a given activity.

The SRA is intended to serve only as a guide (in conjunction with the SCT) to assessing sanctions risks. In that respect, ASO encourages individuals and businesses to seek independent legal advice tailored to their specific situations and ensure thorough due diligence in all activities.


We live in a world that is characterised by heightened geopolitical tensions and uncertainties. Now more than ever, for Australian businesses participating in a globalised economy, understanding and complying with Australia's sanctions laws is paramount. For more information about how your business may be affected and the steps you need to take, contact our team.

Contact

Tags

eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJuYW1laWQiOiIwOGNmMWYxMS1iZjc1LTQzZDItYmY0Mi1mY2M0M2Q0MWFmZjQiLCJyb2xlIjoiQXBpVXNlciIsIm5iZiI6MTc0MjYyNDc3MywiZXhwIjoxNzQyNjI1OTczLCJpYXQiOjE3NDI2MjQ3NzMsImlzcyI6Imh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm1pbnRlcmVsbGlzb24uY29tL2FydGljbGVzL2Fzby1yZWxlYXNlcy1uZXctZ3VpZGFuY2Utb24tYXVzdHJhbGlhcy1zYW5jdGlvbnMtbGF3cyIsImF1ZCI6Imh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm1pbnRlcmVsbGlzb24uY29tL2FydGljbGVzL2Fzby1yZWxlYXNlcy1uZXctZ3VpZGFuY2Utb24tYXVzdHJhbGlhcy1zYW5jdGlvbnMtbGF3cyJ9.MmzcScdK8cCc3GhCbvzwsSqnI0ttmvnoPhd2glG9C-I
https://www.minterellison.com/articles/aso-releases-new-guidance-on-australias-sanctions-laws