Construction Law Update July / August 2019

55 minutes  10.09.2019 Richard Crawford, Andrew Hales, Michael Creedon, David Pearce, Peter Wood, Julie Whitehead, Tom French, Andrew Orford

In this combined July/August edition of our Construction Law Update we break down the most absorbing decisions from New South Wales, Queensland and the Northern Territory. We also look at two recent Federal Court decisions: one which considers the circumstances in which an agreement of a contractual nature will be binding and the other on whether a clause that excludes the recovery of costs resulting from delay or disruption will preclude the recovery of time-related costs for carrying out variations. 

Your July / August 2019 edition is now available. You can also access past editions.

For those of you working within the renewables space, a recent decision from the Queensland Court of Appeal has confirmed that solar farms do not need to be installed by licensed electricians. For others wanting to know the latest and greatest in all things security of payment, decisions in Queensland, New South Wales and the Northern Territory confirm the requirements of valid of payment claims, suggest that courts will not find that an adjudicator has breached natural justice lightly and provide that conduct when dealing with payment claims and adjudication applications can be evidence of the existence of a payment dispute.

In the Australian courts

Commonwealth

  • Binding Nemo: when is an agreement binding? | ACME Properties Pty Ltd v Perpetual Corporate Trust Limited as trustee for Braeside Trust [2019] FCA 1189
  • A contractor is entitled to be paid the time-based costs of carrying out a variation, notwithstanding an express exclusion of delay costs | Lucas Earthmovers Pty Limited v Anglogold Ashanti Australia Limited [2019] FCA 1049

New South Wales

  • Cross-claims against concurrent wrongdoers – the door is still open | Landpower Australia Pty Ltd v Penske Power Systems Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 161
  • Staircase to heaven? A reminder that development approvals are permissive not mandatory and an interim occupation certificate is sometimes enough | Pollak v Yapp [2019] NSWCA 150
  • You can't have your cake and only read every second page | Rhomberg Rail Australia Pty Ltd v Concrete Evidence Pty Limited [2019] NSWSC 755
  • So tell me why, give me good reasons … a claimant needs to know | Style Timber Floor Pty Ltd v Krivosudsky [2019] NSWCA 171
    Queensland
  • Courts will not lightly find an adjudicator has breached natural justice | ABC Glass & Aluminium Pty Ltd v Nik Nominees Pty Ltd & Anor [2019] QSC 171
  • Implied contractual duty of good faith and fair dealing triumphs | Aurizon Network Pty Ltd v Glencore Coal Queensland Pty Ltd & Ors [2019] QSC 163
  • An arbitration clause may render clauses allowing court proceedings unenforceable | Bulkbuild Pty Ltd v Fortuna Well Pty Ltd & Ors [2019] QSC 173
  • Contractors and subcontractors must ensure both a safe place of work and a safe system to work | Cootes v Concrete Panels & Ors [2019] QSC 146
  • Failing to adequately identify construction work will be fatal to a contractor’s payment claim | KDV Sport Pty Ltd v Muggeridge Constructions Pty Ltd & Ors [2019] QSC 178
  • Implied duties to cooperate in loan agreements | Lake Laurel Pty Ltd & Ors v Nichols Constructions Pty Ltd & Ors (No 2) [2019] QSC 145
  • Court of Appeal confirms that solar farms do not need to be installed by licensed electricians | State of Queensland v Maryrorough Solar Pty Ltd [2019] QCA 129
  • 'Building Contract Tie In Deed' does not create separate indebtedness to a lender or builder | Wilkes & Anor v DC Construction Services Pty Ltd [2019] QSC 117

Northern Territory

  • Check my authority! Authority essential in creating a binding contract | Halikos Hospitality Pty Ltd & Ors v INPEX Operations Australia Pty Ltd [2019] NTSC 10
  • Conduct in dealing with payment claims and adjudication applications can be evidence of the existence of payment disputes | Jemena Northern Gas Pipeline Pty Ltd v Civmec Constructions & Engineering Pty Ltd and Smith [2019] NTSC 52

Contact

Tags

eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJuYW1laWQiOiI4YmJkOTVkMS1kMmM0LTRhZWEtOGRkZS1lNTJlZTk4YjBiN2YiLCJyb2xlIjoiQXBpVXNlciIsIm5iZiI6MTczOTcxMDEwOCwiZXhwIjoxNzM5NzExMzA4LCJpYXQiOjE3Mzk3MTAxMDgsImlzcyI6Imh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm1pbnRlcmVsbGlzb24uY29tL2FydGljbGVzL2NvbnN0cnVjdGlvbi1sYXctdXBkYXRlLWp1bHktYXVndXN0LTIwMTkiLCJhdWQiOiJodHRwczovL3d3dy5taW50ZXJlbGxpc29uLmNvbS9hcnRpY2xlcy9jb25zdHJ1Y3Rpb24tbGF3LXVwZGF0ZS1qdWx5LWF1Z3VzdC0yMDE5In0.5RRMzPaT6_MEjDg1fWY9zNRb7VR_ZES191qUMMIPk-A
https://www.minterellison.com/articles/construction-law-update-july-august-2019

Point of View: insights into key issues and challenges facing business today.

In this series of interviews with MinterEllison partners we hear their perspective on key areas of interest to our clients and the business community.